Search Results

You searched for:

Your search found 41 results in 1 resource

Category

Format

Date

  • 1000 – 1124 (0)
  • 1125 – 1249 (0)
  • 1250 – 1374 (0)
  • 1375 – 1500 (0)

Access Type

The Production and Use of English Manuscripts 1060 to 1220 icon

The Production and Use of English Manuscripts 1060 to 1220

41 results from this resource . Displaying 1 to 20

2 s . 6 d '. Short description by Hollie Morgan and Takako Kato (2010). Manuscript not consulted directly. add collation etc if I hear from the Stonyhurst. Dobbie, Elliott van Kirk, The Manuscripts of C~x00e6~dmon's Hymn and Bede's Death

, 5-6 8 . The collation does not reveal the loss of a leaf after 46, between fols 32 and 33, but 41r and 46v are flesh sides ( Ker 1957 , p. 134). Collation on pastedown given as ‘Collation

279). fols 136-184v Damaged by fire; the best preserved leaves measure ca. 200 144 172 120 Impossible to determine a collation as all leaves were individually mounted after the manuscript was damaged by the Cotton Fire. The penitential is written

1-284. An incorrect 16th-century pagination, partly in red pencil, was followed by Wildhagen (1910) . According to Ker 1957 , collation of fols 4-281: 1 8 (wants 1, perhaps blank, before fol. 4); 2-34 8 ; 35 8 (wants 8,

Web . Manuscript described by Hollie Morgan and Takako Kato with Simon Patterson. Manuscript not consulted directly. check extent, foliation, collation, etc, hand desc too, when we got the images Arnold, Thomas, Symeonis monachi opera omnia , Rolls Series, 75,

+ 1 + xxii, foliated (i, ii), 1-241, 241*, 242-311, 313-28, 312, (329-30). Ff. 8, 10-328 were formerly paginated 1-642. Collation of ff. 7, 9-03, 306, 308: 1 8 , 2 8 wants 7, 8, probably blank, after f. 21,

old '33' as '32' and cancelling old foliation from '33' on (fols 1-156 [157-61]) ( Doane 1998 , p. 38). Collation: 1 8 wants 1 (fols. 1-7); 2 8 (fols. 8-15); 3 4+1 2 added (fols. 16-20); 4-9 8 (fols.

196-98. 295 215 195 125 88 143 272 175 180 115 Fols iv + 198 collation from Drage (?) needs checking. TK checked the whole collation of the manuscript, so if time allows, work on this later. Fols 16-191 contain

now pasted to another modern paper flyleaf. 238 158 168 107 Foliated (i-iii), 1-171. According to Liuzza 1995 , the collation is as follows: 1 8 (fols 1-8), 2 8 (fols 9-16), 3 8 (fols 17-24), 4 4 (fols 25-28),

of the folios are now small fragments, so the original number of leaves per quire is not always obvious. The collation as it now appears is: 1 2 , 2 10 , 3-5 8 , 6 10 , 7-11 8

196 224 ca. 120 Fols iv + 107 + iv. Foliated (i-iv), 1-107, (108-11). According to Ker (1957) , the collation of fols 1-107 is as follows: 1 8 wants 1, fols 1-7 2-3 8 , fols 8-23 4 8

v, foliated (i,ii), 1-68, two unnumbered leaves, 69, (70-71). Fols 6-68 were paginated formerly 1-126. According to Ker (1957) , collation is uncertain. There are many half-sheets, fols 30-37 and fols 42-49 are regular quires of eight leaves, fols 25-26

225 130 c. 220 132 Paginated in Parker ian red pencil on rectos, s. xvi: (i-x), 1-75, 79-269, 287-457, (459-464) Collation of pp. 1-30, 33-458: 1-18 8 , 19-26 8 , 27 10 , 28 8 , 29 4 .

case (p. 627). 228 150 c. 188 105 Fols iv + 157 + iv, foliated in pencil (i-iv), 1-157, (158-61). Collation of fols 1- 157: 1- 17 8 , 18 8 wants 7 after fol. 142, 19 8 , 20

and last two leaves are modern paper. Fols (iv), 161, (162) are medieval flyleaves' ( Ker 1957 , p. 450). Collation of fols 1-160: 1 10 + 1 leaf before 2 (fol. 2), 2 8 wants 1 before fol 12,

+ 68 + iii. Fols 10-18, are parchment and 88-90 are paper and they are xvith century supply leaves. The collation is probably, 1 8 wants 8 after fol 9, fols 3-9, 2 8 +1, fols 10-18, 3-7 8 ,

100 , fol. 112 is numbered 110 and fol. 122 is numbered 120 . According to Wilcox (2000) , the collation as follows is tentative for all but the centre quires, as the manuscript is bound very tightly (p. 49):

folios behind all other published foliations. The leaves are now mounted individually in card. According to Ker, on whom the collation details are based here, medieval pencil signatures II-VII on fols 12, 20, 28, 36, 44, 52 show that fols

hand of Gerard Langbaine (1609-1657/8) ( Wilcox 2008 , p. 81). The four individual parts each form a single quire. Collation of fols 10-18: 2 8+1 fol. 18 added The parchment is thick and discoloured, probably evidence of circulation as

(i-iv), 1-235, (236). Fols (i, 236) are parchment flyleaves of the date of binding. Fols (ii-iv) are post-medieval parchment flyleaves. Collation of part A (fols 1-118): 1 8 , 2 8 + 2 leaves after 3 (fols 12, 13), 3

Cite this page:

"Results" Manuscripts Online (www.manuscriptsonline.org, version 1.0, 28 March 2024), https://www.manuscriptsonline.org/search/results?kw=collation&sr=pu